The Challenge of Rising Pension Age and Health Inequality

Spread the love
pension age is going up

The United Kingdom stands at a critical social policy crossroads. As the state pension age steadily climbs, millions of older workers—particularly those in poor health or manual jobs—face a grim reality: working longer despite physical decline or enduring years of financial insecurity before reaching pensionable age. This article unpacks the complexities of this situation and highlights realistic, evidence-backed policy measures to ease the burden.


🕰️ Current State Pension Age Increases

Timeline of Pension Age Changes

The state pension age in the UK is no longer fixed. It is undergoing continual increases:

  • Currently: 66 years for both men and women.

  • 2026–2028: Rising to 67 for those born after 6 April 1960.

  • 2044–2046: Expected rise to 68, with proposals to bring this forward.

  • Future Projections: Analysts speculate it may reach 69 by the late 2040s.

These changes are justified by government narratives around longevity improvements and fiscal sustainability, but they have critical social repercussions.

Gender Equalisation of Pension Age

Between 2010 and 2018, women’s pension age rose from 60 to 65, aligning with men’s. By 2020, both reached 66. While this harmonisation aimed at equality, it disproportionately affected women born in the 1950s—many of whom had insufficient time to adapt their financial plans.


⚕️ The Health Inequality Problem

Impact on Physically Demanding Jobs

Jobs involving manual labour take a profound toll on the human body. Cleaners, care workers, warehouse operatives, and construction workers often report musculoskeletal disorders, chronic fatigue, and deteriorating mobility as early as their late 50s.

Research highlights that workers in low-paid, physically demanding jobs are six times more likely to leave employment due to ill health compared to those in office-based or higher-paid occupations.

Exit from Labour Market Before Pension Age

Data reveals that one in eight individuals aged 60–65 exits the workforce due to poor health. These early exits signal systemic barriers to longevity in work, especially as state pension eligibility slips further from reach.


🗺️ Geographic and Social Disparities

Regional Variations in Health

The ability to work into later life varies greatly depending on geography:

  • Yorkshire & the Humber, Wales: 1 in 7 aged 60–66 stop work due to long-term illness.

  • North East: 1 in 6.

  • Northern Ireland: 1 in 5.

These statistics reflect deep-rooted inequalities in public health and access to healthcare.

Disparities in Healthy Life Expectancy

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) paints a bleak picture:

  • Poorest women: Healthy life expectancy to 51.4 years.

  • Poorest men: Healthy life expectancy to 52.3 years.

  • Wealthiest areas: Men and women live healthily into their early 70s.

A staggering 20-year health gap means millions from deprived communities may never live to enjoy their pensions.


🧩 Increasing Difficulty Claiming Disability Benefits

Declining PIP Approval Rates

Between 2019 and 2024, over half of all Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claims were rejected. The process is widely criticised for being bureaucratic, opaque, and inhumane.

Impact of Assessment Type on Outcomes

  • Face-to-face assessments in 2024 had only a 44% success rate.

  • Telephone/video assessments showed a 57% success rate.

This disparity raises concerns about the quality and fairness of in-person evaluations, often seen as intimidating and rushed.


⚖️ Planned Benefit Restrictions

The 4-Point Rule Explained

Set for introduction in 2026, the 4-point rule mandates claimants must score at least four points in one daily living activity to qualify for the daily living component of PIP.

This change is expected to strip support from:

  • 87% of current standard-rate PIP recipients (~1.1 million people).

  • Vulnerable groups managing conditions like arthritis, chronic pain, and mental health issues.

Work Capability Assessment Reforms

Reforms to the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) are projected to:

  • Remove 424,000 people from the “limited capability for work-related activity” group by 2028–29.

  • Push more ill or disabled individuals into the workforce regardless of health constraints.


🛠️ Potential Solutions

1. Flexible Pension Age Approaches

International models suggest early pension access at actuarially reduced rates (e.g., age 63) can soften the impact on vulnerable groups.

The Pensions Policy Institute recommends a flexible pension window to accommodate diverse health and work conditions, preventing blanket disadvantage.

2. Enhanced Support for Those Near Pension Age

The Institute for Fiscal Studies has proposed:

  • Means-tested income support in the final year before pension age.

  • Options:

    • Universal low-income support (~£600m/year).

    • Targeted health-related support (~£200m/year).

This would cushion those caught in the gap between health deterioration and pension eligibility.

3. Early Access for Terminal Illness

Marie Curie advocates for terminally ill patients to access their pension regardless of age. This would:

  • Cost just £144 million/year (0.1% of state pension budget).

  • Lift 8,600 people a year out of end-of-life poverty.

Despite cross-party support, previous governments have rejected the proposal.

4. Workplace Health and Flexibility Improvements

The EXTEND project calls for systemic changes:

  • Ergonomic adaptations.

  • Anti-discrimination measures.

  • Support for carers in employment.

  • Mental and physical health programmes within workplaces.

A healthier workforce is a more sustainable workforce.

5. Bridging Pension Options

Some occupational pensions offer bridging payments to cover the gap until state pension eligibility.

Though limited in scope, scaling such options across industries could help older workers exit the workforce with dignity.

6. Reform of Disability Benefits Assessment

The current PIP system is flawed:

  • Tribunal appeal success rates of 75–93% signal systemic errors.

  • Suggested improvements:

    • Mandatory recording of assessments.

    • Less reliance on face-to-face evaluations.

    • Rely more on medical documents and less on the often uninformed judgement of the assessor.

Restoring credibility to the system is vital for justice and trust.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top